Ecological Colonialism: A study of the sociocultural context surrounding Biosphere 2

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46516/inmaterial.v11.292

Keywords:

Biosphere 2, counterculture, New Communalists, back-to-the-land, cabin ecology

Abstract

This paper examines the trajectory of the key figures and the sociopolitical context in which the Biosphere 2 project (1987) took shape, situating them within the framework of the American counterculture of the late 1970s and its shift from San Francisco to New Mexico as part of the ‘back-to-the-land’ communal movement.

The main hypothesis argues that initiatives such as Biosphere 2, far from constituting a socio-ecological alternative to the dominant system, operated as an extension of the logic of the US military-industrial complex. Under a countercultural aesthetic and an apparently emancipatory discourse, these types of projects incorporated principles derived from the colonising imagination of the space race, contributing to the legitimisation of forms of environmental and technological control.

The methodology employed is based on an interdisciplinary historiographical and genealogical approach, integrating critical architectural history, science and technology studies, aesthetic theory and environmental thought, while addressing the social, technical and cultural implications of Biosphere 2.

The results demonstrate the decisive influence that the space program had as an underlying ethical principle in the early days of sustainable design and the environmental movement in the West. Furthermore, it is shown that the New Communalist movement did not constitute a break with the dominant culture, but rather an extension of its adaptive logics, through the production and circulation of technological imaginaries that reconfigured environmentalism in terms of technical management and environmental experimentation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Lucía Sanz Montávez, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (Valencia, España)

Research trainee technician (FPI/UPV), graduate in Fine Arts, and holder of a Master’s degree in Artistic Production from the Universitat Politècnica de València. 

María Paula Santiago Martín de Madrid , Universitat Politècnica de València (València, España)

Professor at the Universitat Politècnica de València, PhD in Fine Arts, and Full Professor at the Faculty of Fine Arts of Valencia (UPV). She has served as director of the Art and Environment Research Centre at the Universitat Politècnica de València.

Since 2006, she has participated in and led numerous R&D projects funded through public institutional calls as Principal Investigator. 

References

-Andersson, J. D. (2023). Artificial Earth: A genealogy of planetary technicity. Punctum Books.

-Anker, P. (2005). The closed world of ecological architecture. The Journal of Architecture, 10(5), 527-552.

-Danowski, D. y Viveros de Castro, E. (2019). ¿Hay mundo por venir? Ensayo sobre los miedos y los fines. Caja Negra Editora.

-Di Stefano, E., Friberg, C. y Ryynänen, M. (Eds.) (2022). Aesthetic perspectives on culture, politics, and landscape: Appearances of the political. Springer.

-Fuller, B. (1969). Operating manual for Spaceship Earth. Lars Müller Publishers.

-Gentry, L. y Liptak, K. (1991). The Glass Ark: The story of Biosphere 2. Viking Press.

-Gitlin, T. (1989). The Sixties: Years of Hope, Days of Rage. Bantam Books.

-Ivison, T. y Tcharfas, S. (2019). Biosphere 2’s Experimental Life en Kajo-O’Gardy, Russell Huges y Chris L. Smith (Eds.), Laboratory Lifestyles: The Construction of Scientific Fictions (pp. 169-193). MIT Press.

-Kallipoliti, L. (2018a). History of ecological design en Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Enviromental Science. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.144

-Kallipoliti, L. (2018b). The architecture of close worlds. Lars Müller Publishers.

-Kanter, R. M. (1972). Commitment and community: Communes and utopias in sociological perspective. Harvard University Press.

-Martin, B. (2004). The Theater is in the Street: Politics and Performance in Sixties America. University of Massachusetts Press.

-Martínez, P., Santiago, E. y Vindel, J. (Eds.) (2025). Atlas cultural de la energía. Catarata.

-Matusow, A. J. (1984). The Unraveling of America: A History of Liberalism in The 1960s. Harper & Row.

-McHarg, I. L. (1969). Design with Nature. Natural History Press.

-Minguito García, A. P. (2023). El síndrome de la cápsula ecosistémica, o los antihábitats del cierre ecológico. REIA-Revista Europea de Investigación en Arquitectura, (23). https://doi.org/10.64197/REIA.23.965

-Mestre, N. (2020). Over-Designed Ecologies en Sara Marini (Ed.), Nella selva (pp. 110-121). Quodlibet.

-Miller, M. (2011). Spheres, Domes, Limits, Interfaces: The Transgressive Architecture of Biosphere 2. University of Michigan Press.

-Miller, T. (1999). The 60’s Communes: Hippies and Beyond. Syracuse University Press.

-Morffitt, L. (2023). Architecture’s Model Environments. UCL Press.

-Reider, R. (2009). Dreaming the biosphere: The Theater of all possibilities. University of New Mexico Press.

-Sartwell, C. (2010). Political aesthetics. Cornell University Press.

-Scott, F. (2008). Living Archive 7: Ant Farm. Allegorical Time Warp: The Media Fallout of July 21, 1969. Actar.

-Scott, F. (2016a). Outlaw territories: Environments of insecurity/architecture of counterinsurgency. Zone Books.

-Scott, F. (2016b). Securing Adjustable Climate. Columbia Books on Architecture and the City, Lars Müller Publishers.

-Todd, N. y Todd, J. (1994). From Eco-Cities to Living Machines: Principles of Ecological Design. North Atlantic Books.

-Turner, F. (2006). From Counterculture to Cyberculture. University of Chicago Press.

-Ulloa, A. (2002). Pensando verde: El surgimiento y desarrollo de la conciencia ambiental global en G. Palacio y A. Ulloa (Eds.), Repensando la naturaleza: Encuentros y desencuentros disciplinarios en torno a lo ambiental (pp. 205-226). UNAL-Sede Leticia-Imani-ICANH-Colciencias.

COVER

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

[1]
Sanz Montávez, L. and Santiago Martín de Madrid , M.P. 2025. Ecological Colonialism: A study of the sociocultural context surrounding Biosphere 2 . INMATERIAL. Diseño, Arte y Sociedad. 11, 21 (Jun. 2025), 12–30 p. DOI:https://doi.org/10.46516/inmaterial.v11.292.