28
Inmaterial 11_Artículo_ Colour Agencies: colouring plants, cyanobacteria & micro-algae a practice-based research on
sustainable sources. Understanding Design as a messy socio-technical Actor-Network_Sina Hensel, Anja Neuefeind
Context
In short, sustainable access to natural resources has become essential and demands
a rethinking of our usual production techniques. Recent perspectives such as posts-
tructuralism (Deleuze, Guaari, 1980), Actor-Network-eory (Latour, Callon,
Law, 1980) and Material-Oriented Ontology (Benne, 2010) seek to challenge the
hegemony of the previously-dominant anthropocentric outlook, aiming to change
our perspective towards the agency of the non-human and therefore constitute
a perspective of acknowledgment, companionship (Haraway, 2003) and care
towards other entities (Neimanis, 2017)
1
. is especially applies to the rising awa-
reness of how the interconnection between human and non-human forces across
all disciplines has led to a renewed engagement with the dynamics of material and
its entanglement with discursive practices, a perspective which is referred to with
the term New Materialism or Material Turn (Yoshihara, 1956, Barad, 2007, Ingold,
2007)
2
. Philosophy, and Social and Cultural Sciences shed new light on material
properties and their role in the production of art, design and architecture. e
research project ‘Living Colour’ discusses these theoretical perspectives in order
to consider novel accounts of acting forces, processual nature and self-organising
capacities of maer, whereby maer is perceived as co-productive in conditioning
and enabling social worlds, human life and experience.
is framework, given during the teaching format, requires operating in practice,
“the turn to the performative, which revises traded methods and integrated expe-
rience and aesthetics, characteristic to arts and design, in a culture of knowledge
1
Poststructuralism established theories to overcome humanistic human-centred views in philosophy. In visual arts, design and architecture,
these ideas had a deep impact in theoretical and practical belongings, because they changed and challenged common conceptions of creativity.
Among the many positions we cite are Deleuze and Guaari, establishing the idea of assemblage, and Latour, who developed the Actor-Ne-
twork-eory, or ANT, with Callon and Law at the same time, enabling ideas of agency and symmetric relationship.
In parallel to this development, Donna Haraway proposed provocative theses on biotechnological challenges and the conditions of making scien-
ce. Her border-crossing analyses on science and social relations, and her term ’situated knowledge’ (1988) paved the way to trans-disciplinary for-
ms of research as well as marking a fundamental shi in understanding human agency. Her term ’companionship’ (2003) suggests an equality of
all entities including animals, plants and maer and emphasises relationship, which gave an important impulse to change perspective on scientic
and artistic practice, similar to Jane Benne’s political and ecological approach to materiality in her main work “vibrant maer”, 2010.
Astrida Neimanis is one of many thinkers and writers who suggests rethinking the dominant Western and humanist understandings of embodi-
ment, where human bodies are gured as fundamentally autonomous from the non-human, and who proposes to cultivate gestures of empathy,
stewardship and nourishment towards natural commons in the context of nite resources.
2
Important aspects in new materialism concerning material agency are the mutual relationship of material and mind, as stated in opposition
to western humanistic thinking by ’gutai’, a group of Japanese artists in 1956, and stated by Jiro Yoshihara in the “gutai manifesto” as well as the
focus on a material-discursive practice by Karen Barad on materiality and performance in her “agential realism” in 2012. Her main inuence on
practice-based research formats is her conclusion that knowledge is continuously changing in practicing with materiality.
Ingold follows this argumentation when stating “e properties of materials, then, are not xed aributes of maer but are processual and
relational.” He also shaped the term “ocean of materiality, in which humans like all other entities, swim.” (Ingold, 2007, p.8). In this ocean
materials exist on their own terms. “Plants, too, provide an endless source of materials for further processing and transformation. One has only
to enumerate, for example, all the dierent materials that can be derived from trees, including wood, bark, sap, gum, ash, paper, charcoal, tar,
resin and turpentine (Ingold, 2007, p.8).